Showing posts with label City of Long Beach. Show all posts
Showing posts with label City of Long Beach. Show all posts

Monday, July 25, 2016

Schipske Protests Water and Sewer Rate Increases Because of Massive Transfer of Water Department Funds to City General Fund



July 25, 2016


Former 5th District Councilwoman Gerrie Schipske, today sent a letter of protest to the Long Beach Water Department Board of Commissioners over their proposed 4% increases in both water and sewer rates.  The announced increases would be the third in a row by the Water Department, which is an independent entity overseen by an appointed Board of Commissioners.


Schipske based her protest on the fact that the increases are due in part to the City of Long Beach manipulating a massive transfer of Water Department funds into the City's General Fund by assessing the Water Department with a "pipeline assessment fee" on both water and sewer pipes. These fees have been passed along to the ratepayer.


"This Budget year," explains Schipske,  "the City of Long Beach is assessing the Water Department $6.16 million for water pipelines and $4.73 million for sewers. This represents 0.2% of the water budget and 0.8% of the sewer budget." The assessment was started in 2006 and increased each budget year.


Schipske contends that these fees violate Proposition 218 which states in part, that cities cannot assess fees in order to generate revenue. "The fees must relate to actual costs incurred by the city to allow pipelines and sewers," says Schipske. "The fees also must be accounted for and utilized specifically to cover the costs."


Schipske notes that prior rate increase notices included a breakdown of what was causing the rate increases, including the pipeline assessment fee. "However, the current notice of rate increases does not include any explanation of how the city fees are a part of the rate increases."


In 2012, the City of Fullerton was sued for tacking on a similar fee for its water ratepayers. The fee was later stopped and revenue returned when an analysis was done showing that the fees were not related to actual costs as required by Proposition 218. 
 
Schipske reminded Commissioners that as  a councilwoman she asked the City Attorney in 2012 about the Fullerton case and why Long Beach was assessing the pipeline fees. "I was told that the case allowed cities to assess their utilities and that is correct. However, the assessment cannot be used to raise revenue and cannot exceed the actual costs which is required to ensure compliance with Proposition 218. I assert the fees are not in compliance with Proposition 218."
 
Schipske expressed concern that the Board of Commissioners have not protected ratepayers: "This is the third year in a row that the Long Beach Water Department Board of Commissioners has recommended rate increases, while it has sat silent about the City of Long Beach transferring millions of dollars in water department revenue into its General Fund." 


"The Long Beach Board of Commissioners has not met its fiduciary duty to its ratepayers because it has failed to challenge the City's assessment or to demand an accounting of how the assessment is spent by the  City of Long Beach. By not doing so, the Board of Water Commissioners has subjected its ratepayers to increases for water and sewer and increases in the 5% utility users tax which is assessed on the amount of water use billed."


 "So thanks to the Board of Commissioners appointed by the Mayor, the City gets two bites of the revenue stream: pipeline fees and increased utility taxes at the expense of ratepayers."


Schipske has requested that the rate increases be stopped until such time that a complete analysis is done on the fees and the actual costs the fees are being raised on. She also asked that there be an accounting of where the tens of millions in funds transferred since 2006 have been spent by the City of Long Beach and that any funds in excess of actual costs be returned to the ratepayers.


Written letters of protest must be submitted by the public hearing date of September 1 at 7:00pm. Letters should be sent to: Long Beach Board of Water Commissioners, Attn: Board Secretary, 1800 East Wardlow Road, Long Beach, CA 90807. The Public Hearing is open to the public and will be held at the Long Beach Groundwater Treatment Plant Assembly Room, 2950 Redondo Avenue, Long Beach, CA 90807.

See attached protest letter


Wednesday, May 20, 2015

Council Should Pass a "Taxless Tuesday" Instead of "Meatless Monday"

Yes folks, it was an interesting and very important discussion this past Tuesday in City Council. 

No, it wasn't about restoring services in the police and fire departments. 

And no, it wasn't about the declining oil revenues and the increasing costs of water facing the City.

It was about supporting a movement to encourage residents to go vegetarian by passing (on a 7-2 vote) a resolution to encourage residents to observe "Meatless Mondays."

"Meatless Mondays" isn't the most original idea to come along since many people already have stopped eating meat, either because they can't afford it or they believe eating less meat is healthier.

Having a City Council weigh in on something as personal as what people eat is strange, considering the many serious issues facing the City.

Drafting the resolution took staff time and so did the Council discussion. It will come back to Council for yet another vote. All this time could be put to better use.

For instance, how about passing a "Taxless Tuesday" resolution that pledges that local government will stop looking for ways every Tuesday to tax residents and instead focus on making City government more efficient and frugal?

The next city budget will arrive in a few months filled with increased fees and perhaps additional cuts to service. And you will hear chatter about increasing the utility user tax to make up for short falls. 

Then ask the Mayor and Council why it can spend a million dollars to obtain a Bloomberg grant that won't generate any additional revenue to the City but added more staff to the city payroll.

Ask Council why City employees (more than 5000) still don't clock in and out of work but are allowed to fill in their own time sheets.

Question why real performance measures are missing from budget documents and why the Council won't put the City Manager on notice that he either reports them or is replaced.

The Council needs to get busy with the real business of local government: fiscal reform and performance management.

Stop the theatrics or as Shakespeare wrote" sound and fury signifying nothing."







Tuesday, May 5, 2015

Stinky Water Back in Long Beach for Awhile

I can always remember the smell of the water that came out of the taps in my Grandmother's home on Santa Fe Avenue in the Gold Star Manor. It was the same smell that was at family friends' homes on Easy Avenue. The smell of rotten eggs  -- hydrogen sulfide.

The smell is back in Long Beach. I asked the Water Department why and here is the official response:

The LBWD's Groundwater Treatment Plant went back into service Wednesday, April 22, 2015 after being out of service for annual maintenance. Some of the local wells that are treated at the groundwater plant have low but detectable levels of hydrogen sulfide, and some customers may have a higher degree of sensitivity to this “rotten egg-like” odor.  Hydrogen sulfide is not harmful. LBWD is working on blending the groundwater with purchased treated water to make it more palatable. This issue should be resolved by May 11, 2015. If a customer has any other questions relating to their water, please contact our Water Quality Lab at 562-570-2482

Saturday, January 24, 2015

Tripling Officeholder Accounts Violates Prop M Passed by Voters

The move by the City Council to triple the amount that can be raised annually for "officeholder accounts" may in fact violate the intent of Proposition M which was approved by the voters of Long Beach in 1994 as a way to curb the influence of money in local politics.

Prop M (among other things) limits campaign fundraising amounts for each elected office and limits fundraising to just the year before and during an election. The intent was to make sure elected officials were focusing on their work and not fundraising.

"Officeholder accounts" were added by the City Council in 1995 and under state government code can only be used for "non political" expenditures.

Now along comes a new city council which doesn't seem too concerned about political reform and is pushing through legislation that would triple the amount that can be raised year round for "officeholder accounts" from $10,000 to $30,000 -- thereby opening the flood gates for donors to give money even when a campaign for office is not scheduled. 

Not all cities have "officeholder accounts." Some cities allow an officeholder account only with extra money raised during campaign season.

So three council members opposed tripling the allowable amounts -- they only wanted to double them.

The ethical thing to do now would be to propose (as many other cities have) to put into place a companion piece of legislation: make it illegal for council members to vote on any issue if he or she has received more than $250 in the past 12 months from someone connected with the issue -- usually a contractor or developer. (Can also be extended to a union organization.) 

Come on City Council show the voters what you're really made of. 


Thursday, January 15, 2015

City Posts Vacancies for Committees, Commissions and Boards

English: Vacancies sign, High Street, Tullamor...

The City Clerk has posted a listing of current vacancies for city committees, commissions and boards. While none of the heavy-weight (Charter) commissions have openings, there are quite a few others still needing the volunteer services of residents. Take a look below or by clicking here:



If you are interested in applying for any of these, click here to complete an application.



Monday, January 12, 2015

Long Beach May Get Two Grants from Knight Foundation

The Knight Foundation has announced that 126 finalists in the first ever Knight Cities Challenge includes two from Long Beach:

  • Give and You Shall Receive (Submitted by Rachel Ng): Creating a neighborhood-based skills exchange where residents can offer their talent or post their needs.
  • Living Walls by Nostrum Inc. (Submitted by Susan Collida): Enlivening blank neighborhood walls by mobilizing residents to collaborate and create community assets around the walls,  such as vertical gardens, rock climbing, film screens or visual art.
Over 7,000 entries were received in the Challenge for “new ideas to build more successful cities across the United States.” The Challenge is providing grants of all sizes from a pool of $5 million dollars.

The 126 finalists have three weeks to submit a final application with additional information about their ideas. Winners will be announced this spring.


City Hall Survey on "New" Civic Center Misses Important Question for Taxpayers: Do You Want the City To Obligate Money for a New Structure?

The train has left the station about what would be included in the design and build of a "new civic" center. But no doubt insiders at City Hall are touting the on-line survey posted at http://lbciviccenter.com/ which asks a series of questions about the potential  "New Civic Center" as "public engagement."

Admittedly, there are questions asking for input on this project which is estimated to cost between $380 million to $463 million dollars. 

But the first three questions are "softballs" -- intended to make it seem this is providing real input. The subjects of the remaining questions (4-9) are ALREADY INCLUDED in the proposal picked by the City Council as elements offered by the developer. 

The rest of the questions are included perhaps to make the case that the City Hall and City Library are not utilized very much and therefore are an afterthought in what the real intention of developing this parcel of land is really about.

But check the questions out and find what wasn't asked:














 Where are the questions about whether or not taxpayers want the City to obligate taxpayers in any financing scheme let alone one which will obligate taxpayers for many years? With dire predictions about pension costs and low oil revenues, is this the most prudent use of tax dollars?

Also missing, are questions as to whether or not taxpayers would prefer that the City Hall be retrofitted. You have to ask yourselves if the structure is so unsafe (which staff has claimed since 2007) then why is it still occupied and why will it continue to be occupied until a new building is completed in 2018?

A hidden fact is that the RFQ included a statement that the developer would be given the Lincoln Parking Garage (which generates a great deal of revenue for the City). When is the public going to be asked about that transaction?

Long Beach Inside will keep looking at this project.

Sunday, January 11, 2015

City Has Guide to Neighborhood Groups

The City Neighborhood Resource Center, which is funded through the City of Long Beach Development Services Department, has an updated "List of Neighborhood Groups" that provides a handy resource for finding out how residents can become involved in their neighborhood or community wide. (Click here for List)

The directory includes: 

  • 75 Neighborhood Associations
  • 42 Homeowner Associations
  • 59 City wide Community Organizations
  • 13 Business Associations

If you are looking for a way to become involved in your neighborhood and you don't see a group on this map to join that fits what what you want to do -- then start your own. 


Community service and involvement is the "glue" that keeps neighborhoods strong and vibrant.

Need an idea of where to start? Click here for toolkits provided on Serve.com.  


NOTE: The Neighborhood Services Bureau is located at 425 Atlantic Avenue and is committed to providing innovative programs and services designed to improve Long Beach neighborhoods. With support from the Community Development Advisory Commission, and using approximately $6,000,000 annually in Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds, the Bureau offers a variety of tools you and your neighbors can use to improve your homes and neighborhoods. It also provides family safety, leadership skills and other important programs. For more information call at (562) 570-570-1010.